Welcome to the Florida Courier! |

Advertisement

Other stories

*** If Obama loses, what’s Plan B? *** Oil fuels chaos around the Horn of Africa *** Black CEO in Orlando has plenty on his plate *** President Obama’s got you covered! *** Are you a socially conscious consumer? *** Make public colleges free for all who qualify *** FAMU ‘haze-icide’ still murder *** Civil disobedience or uncivil chaos? *** For Mother with love *** Jackson expounds on expanded role as ‘master manipulator’ *** Fox changes name of ‘Neighborhood Watch’ film *** Filming to begin on Hendrix movie starring Andre 3000 *** Key to health: Six miles a day for 41 years *** Random thoughts of a free Black mind, v. 139 *** President Obama must solidify his base *** Fidel Castro is a friend of ours *** Would America let MLK have a job today? *** Why Obama won’t help foreclosure victims *** Clinton, Obama and campaign spam *** The war on Black women and children *** Students with loans deserve ‘corporate’ treatment *** Economy has dumped energy issues onto Obama’s lap *** Sip of MEXICO *** ‘Khloe and Lamar’ ending on E! *** Film festival in South Beach to shine spotlight on Akils *** Lil Wayne settles ‘Lollipop’ lawsuit *** Aspiring doctors pressing forward despite economy *** New drug may combat side effects of schizophrenia *** Random thoughts of a free Black mind, v. 138 *** Why ‘Negroes’ should get guns *** Cool gold or fool’s gold? *** Obama withholds foreclosure aid to hardest hit *** Racially profiling Black businesses *** No Secret Service scandal if supervisor was a man *** ‘Scandalous’ sizzle or fizzle? *** Wisdom from our ancestors *** LETTER TO THE EDITOR *** No chance to become ‘The Bachelor’ *** Actors adopt schools through Obama initiative *** Essence fires White managing editor over Facebook posts *** PUTTING THE SPOTLIGHT ON SPUDS *** Earth Day with Lush *** Random thoughts of a free Black mind, v. 137 *** Sybrina Fulton is Trayvon Martin’s angelic mother *** What will the U.S. do when it’s No. 2? *** A snitch named time *** Trayvon may be this generation’s Rodney King *** A scared Negro will get you killed, part 2 *** Trayvon boycotts are a misdirection of a potential movement *** What a difference guns make *** Surgery for curvature of the spine no longer so devastating for teens *** New documentary aims to show more ‘rounded’ Marley *** Studdard leaves marriage with all his money *** TV One to debut ‘Momma’ cooking competition *** Inspired Ideas to Change Up Your Chicken Dishes *** Random thoughts of a free Black mind, v. 136 *** Black middle class must wake up and smell the collard greens *** Prosecutors are like ghosts *** ‘Kill at will’ laws block justice for Trayvon *** Bend over (or squat) and spread ‘em, says Obama ***

Banner

Advertisement

Photo Gallery

dsc-6919
dsc-6920
dsc-6922
dsc-6924
dsc-6925
dsc-6929
dsc-6930
dsc-6934
dsc-6939
dsc-6942
dsc-6949
dsc-6955

Banner

Ron Paul’s racist rants

Written by Fcadmin | 25 December 2011
( 1095 Votes )
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

 

 

By George E. Curry, NNPA Columnist - If you’ve watched any of the Republican debates, you’ll remember Ron Paul, the 76-year-old libertarian congressman from Texas whose oversized suit coats look like they are about to fall off his frail shoulders. You’ll also remember that no debate questioner asked him about the overtly racist views that appeared in his newsletters for two decades.

 

But now that Paul has surged to front-runner status in Iowa, he is being grilled about comments that range from denigrating Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. to objecting to passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

In the 1990s, he described Dr. King as a “world-class philanderer who beat up his paramours” and “seduced underage girls and boys.” He even claimed – without a hint of proof – that Dr. King “made a pass at” fellow civil rights warrior Ralph Abernathy, who succeeded King as president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC).

When Ronald Reagan signed the Martin Luther King Holiday bill into law, Paul wrote, “What an infamy Ronald Reagan approved it!” He added, “We can thank him for our annual Hate Whitey Day.”

The controversial remarks were published in various for-profit Ron Paul newsletters in the 1980s and 1990s. The newsletters included: Ron Paul’s Political Report, Ron Paul’s Freedom Report, Ron Paul’s Survival Report and the Ron Paul’s Investment Letter.

On January 8, 2008, The New Republic ran an article on Paul titled, “Angry White Man.” It was accompanied by an illustration of Paul wearing a confederate necktie and rebel hat. The story, written by James Kirchick, noted that Ron Paul’s newsletters were published on a monthly basis from 1978 to at least 1999. Most are on file in the right-wing extremists literature collections at the Wisconsin Historical Society and the University of Kansas.

Here are some excerpts from the newsletters, which were said to earn Paul at least $1million a year:

· After the uprising in Watts, the Ron Paul Political Report said in June 1992, “Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks three days after rioting began.”

·      According to the newsletter, the uprising was caused by government-backed “’civil rights,’ quotas, mandated hiring preferences, set-asides for government contracts, gerrymandered voting districts, black bureaucracies, black mayors, black curricula in schools, black tv shows, black tv anchors, hate crime laws, and public humiliation for anyone who dares question the black agenda.”

· “*… If you have ever been robbed by a black teen-age male, you know how unbelievably fleet-footed they can be,” one report said.

·    According to a newsletter bearing Paul’s name, “…Opinion polls consistently show only about 5% of blacks have sensible political opinions.”

· The late congresswoman Barbara Jordon of Texas was called the “archetypical half-educated victimologist.”

· I*  a December 1989 edition of Ron Paul’s Investment Letter, it was predicted that “Racial Violence Will Fill Our Cities.” According to the publication, “…Mostly black welfare recipients will feel justified in stealing from mostly white ‘haves.’”

· I* In June 1991, following a racial incident in the Adams Morgan section of Washington, D.C., one headline screamed, “Animals Take Over the D.C. Zoo.”

· I* In October of 1992, a newsletter bearing Paul’s name stated, “I’ve urged everyone in my family to know how to use a gun in self defense. For the animals are coming.”

· “* Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of black males in that city are semi-criminal if not entirely criminal,” one Ron Paul newsletter asserts.

· * Praising former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke in 1990, Ron Paul said through his newsletter that “our priority should be to take the anti-government, anti-tax, anti-crime, anti-welfare loafers, anti-race-privilege, anti-foreign meddling message of Duke, and enclose it in a more consistent package of freedom.”

 

Ron Paul’s venom was not limited to his newsletters.  While many were celebrating the 40th anniversary of the 1964 Civil Rights Act in 2004, Ron Paul was still objecting to it, saying June 4, 2004 on the floor of Congress, “…the Civil Rights Act of 1964 did not improve race relations or enhance freedom. Instead, the forced integration dictated by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 increased racial tensions while diminishing individual liberty.”

Incredulously, Ron Paul wants us to believe that not only did he not write the un-bylined racist comments in the newsletters that carried his name, but that he was unaware they appeared in his publications.

“I didn’t write them, I didn’t read them at the time, and I disavow them,” he told Gloria Borger of CNN. “I never read that stuff. I was probably unaware of it 10 years after it was written, and it’s been going on 20 years that people have pestered me about this. CNN does it every single time. When are you going to wear yourself out?”

When Borger continued to press Paul, he abruptly terminated the interview. “These are pretty incendiary,” she told Paul. Unclipping his microphone, he said, “Only because of people like you.”

No, only because of Ron Paul’s documented record of racism.

 

George E. Curry, former editor-in-chief of Emerge magazine and the NNPA News Service, is a keynote speaker, moderator, and media coach. He can be reached through his Web site, www.georgecurry.com You can also follow him at www.twitter.com/currygeorge.

 

Last Updated ( Sunday, 25 December 2011 23:13 )  

Comments  

 
#37 Nate 2011-12-26 11:33 Even if what you say in this article is true.. it does not change the fact that you are using a tired and debunked tactic. Discredit the messenger not the message. If you compare Dr Pauls voting recond to the rest of the pack.. his is the only totally neutral and constitutional.

Ron Paul is not a racist … he supports your right to be a total dick head for instance… It makes a lot of sense to cut off all foreign aid… end the fed and reduce the fed register by 50%. If you "get it" then you would realize this article is nothing less than the trash this country needs to rid itself of.

I tell you what is really racists…

A jewish religious symbol on the white house grounds… and not a a christian one or any other… you tell me who is the racist at the top.

kindly go fuck yourself with this stupid article.
Quote
 
 
#36 Eddie 2011-12-26 06:57 It's hard to take serious an article written by someone with a personal agenda against the candidate. The introduction begins by mocking the candidate based on the size coats he wears. Rather than relate him to a position he has taken the author uses it as an opportunity to take a jab at his clothing before moving on to the serious matter. Childish. Loses credibility on the point of the article itself. Quote
 
 
#35 John Carlton 2011-12-26 03:44 This is something that the establishment is pushing to discredit Ron Paul. You are part of the establishment. You are not credible. Quote
 
 
#34 marty 2011-12-26 01:18 If you want to really read racist rants, try reading the Talmud. Quote
 
 
#33 John V 2011-12-26 00:21 Ron Paul- Voted YES on MLK day years before newsletters.

Newt Gingrich- Voted NO
Quote
 
 
#32 bse2 2011-12-25 17:41 Whoever this author is, he does not kinow Ron Paul - Ron Paul is certainly no racist. He is generous man with a plan to actually help this country - all people in the country.

I have watched for 25 years while US tax policy sends jobs overseas. Ron Paul will correct this bringing prosperity and Jobs back to america. If you want prosperity, vote Ron Paul 2012.
Quote
 
 
#31 celebs4truth.com 2011-12-25 15:40 Help this pro-Ron Paul article go viral! Spread it all over the internet, all over the social networks!: http://www.examiner.com/conspiracy-in-denver/support-the-troops-by-supporting-ron-paul Quote
 
 
#30 shawn brown 2011-12-25 15:17 Shame, shame, shame on you for this garbage hit piece trying to slander the good Dr Ron Paul.

Dr Ron Paul was in Congress for over a quarter century…please if he's such a racist, perhaps you can post some c-span or other video footage with Dr Paul actually speaking these hateful phrases… (crickets chirping)…yeah I thought so!
Quote
 
 
#29 Joe 2011-12-25 14:33 smear him some more. It is only sweeter when he win. Quote
 
 
#28 Kate 2011-12-25 14:27 For anyone who hasn't seen it, CNN edited their interview with Ron Paul to make it look like he was avoiding talking about the newsletters and walked off…totally not true…the actual interview was about 8 minutes long, was conducted standing and he was asked three times about those newsletters which he answered as well as other issues.

Boo to CNN…another MSM outlet that dies for lack of credibility.

Just google "cnn edit"…you'll see

Even people who don't support Ron Paul are outraged at the continuation of "news media's " attempts to manage what the public sees and hears. People that maybe wouldn't normally vote for Ron Paul may decide to, for the simple reason of fairness.

As for the newsletters, the MSM has admitted that it didn't pay attention to it before because Dr. Paul was considered fringe…however, he was still a member of congress so that excuse is weak to say the least. Sensationalism, not journalism is the obvious answer.
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh